Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Vs Tecno Camon Cx specs & price

    Pin   Share
Specs Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Tecno Camon CX
Image samsung Galaxy S10 Plus tecno Camon CX
Price* $ 1,000 $ 121
2G & 3G Yes Yes
4G LTE Yes Yes
5G No No
OS Android 9.0 (Pie) Android 7.0 (Nougat)
SIM Hybrid Dual
Rear Camera 16.0 MP 16.0 MP
Chip Maker Exynos Mediatek
Chipset (SoC) 9820 MT6750
Front Camera 10.0 MP 16.0 MP
RAM 12 GB 3 GB
Storage 1024 GB 32 GB
CPU Octa Core 1.5 GHz Octa Core
GPU
Display Ratio
Specs Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Tecno Camon CX
Battery 4100 mAh 3200 mAh
Screen Size 6.4 Inches 5.5 Inches
Fingerprint Yes Yes
Dimension 157.6 x 74.1 x 7.8 mm 152.8 x 75.8 x 5.6 mm
Resolution 1440 x 3040 pixels 1080 x 1920 pixels
SD Card Yes upto 512GB Yes upto 128GB
Bluetooth Yes Yes
WiFi Yes Yes
Description The Samsung Galaxy S10+ [SM-G975F/DS (Global); SM-G975U (USA); SM-G975W (Canada)] has the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (China) and 8+128 GB, 8+512 GB or 12 GB + 1 TB variant. Features Corning Gorilla Glass 6, Samsung Pay, One UI, Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 & 2x2.31 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEA processors, Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.41 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) - USA/LATAM, China variant, triple (12+12+16 MP) rear cameras, dual (10+8 MP) front cameras, noise cancellation, Bluetooth 5.0, NFC, heart rate sensor, fast charge, wireless charge and reverse charge. Comes in Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Green, Prism Blue, Canary Yellow, Flamingo Pink, Ceramic Black and Ceramic White colors. The Tecno Camon CX has the MT6750 or MT6755, 2+16 GB or 3+32 GB variants. Features 1.5 GHz Quad Core + 1.0 GHz Quad Core processors and Fast Charge. Comes in Grey, Rose Golden, Golden and Blue colors.

* Prices might vary slightly or significantly depending on location and variant of the device model.

Compare Specs



Device Type


Models


VS


Find a Device

Device Type
Brand
RAM (GB)
Internal (GB)
OS
Version
Price ($)
4G LTE
Fingerprint .
Chipset
Battery (mAh)
F* Camera (MP)
B* Camera (MP)
Screen (Inch)

Others have compared